Hey, this An Inconvenient Truth final exam could be one of my best ideas of the year. What did my students think, though? It went something like this:
MONDAY Let me get this straight: You're saying that our final is based on a movie?! And we get to work on it all week?! We love Ms. Chang!
WEDNESDAY They realize what kind of exam this is: a thinking one. Open-ended questions requiring them to read graphs, draw conclusions, infer, etc. Why couldn't we have a normal multiple choice exam? Ms. Chang's always got to be different and hard. Plus, the movie is "boring".
THURSDAY The movie, I think, gets more interesting because they complain less. And having prompted them through a couple questions, they're starting to think for themselves. A couple students are gaining confidence as they answer questions right.
FRIDAY Friday was a great day. They understood - it sunk in - the consequences of global warming, and they were starting to show emotion about the rottenness of politics and our economic system. At one point, JA pulled me aside to tell me, "I've been thinking about this movie, Ms. Chang, and I think global warming is like an immune system for the earth...." Get me a chair, I need to sit down. Score!
I realize that summer is a day away, so all we discussed this week could be bleached away in their first taste of sunshine and freedom. But I pin my hopes on one day when the dialogue about global warming finally reaches them - and it will - that my former students will have a little background on this matter.
I told them before we began that this could possibly be the most important thing I've taught them all year. We can only wait and see.
Tuesday, May 22, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Ecology studies the interrelationship between organisms and their environment. It originates from the German word okologie, first used in 1873.
This blog documents one organism's interactions with her environment.
blog archive
- November 2016 (3)
- November 2015 (2)
- August 2015 (1)
- July 2015 (4)
- May 2015 (4)
- March 2015 (1)
- February 2015 (2)
- January 2015 (3)
- December 2014 (1)
- November 2014 (5)
- September 2014 (3)
- August 2014 (5)
- July 2014 (5)
- June 2014 (6)
- May 2014 (1)
- April 2014 (4)
- March 2014 (6)
- February 2014 (6)
- January 2014 (13)
- December 2013 (5)
- November 2013 (4)
- October 2013 (5)
- September 2013 (6)
- August 2013 (10)
- July 2013 (8)
- June 2013 (4)
- May 2013 (1)
- April 2013 (1)
- September 2012 (2)
- August 2012 (2)
- July 2012 (2)
- June 2012 (1)
- May 2012 (2)
- March 2012 (1)
- February 2012 (2)
- January 2012 (1)
- December 2011 (4)
- November 2011 (3)
- October 2011 (1)
- September 2011 (1)
- August 2011 (3)
- July 2011 (3)
- June 2011 (4)
- May 2011 (2)
- April 2011 (1)
- September 2010 (2)
- August 2010 (2)
- July 2010 (5)
- June 2010 (3)
- May 2010 (5)
- March 2010 (4)
- February 2010 (4)
- January 2010 (6)
- December 2009 (9)
- November 2009 (2)
- September 2009 (5)
- August 2009 (2)
- July 2009 (7)
- June 2009 (7)
- May 2009 (3)
- April 2009 (1)
- March 2009 (6)
- February 2009 (4)
- January 2009 (1)
- December 2008 (10)
- November 2008 (5)
- October 2008 (2)
- September 2008 (3)
- August 2008 (1)
- June 2008 (2)
- May 2008 (2)
- April 2008 (3)
- March 2008 (4)
- February 2008 (11)
- January 2008 (7)
- December 2007 (9)
- November 2007 (7)
- October 2007 (6)
- September 2007 (2)
- August 2007 (3)
- July 2007 (10)
- June 2007 (11)
- May 2007 (17)
- April 2007 (15)
- March 2007 (14)
- February 2007 (14)
- January 2007 (7)
What would be the hope of being personally whole in a dismembered society, or personally healthy in a landscape scalped, scraped, eroded, and poisoned, or personally free in a land entirely controlled by the government [or corporations], or personally enlightened in an age illuminated only by TV? - Wendell Berry
No comments:
Post a Comment